Abstract
Background and purposeCervical spine injury is common in the setting of blunt trauma and there is consensus that cervical spine CT (CSCT) is the image modality of choice for initial evaluation for blunt trauma related injuries of the cervical spine. However, there is disagreement in the literature with regards to further evaluation of blunt trauma patients with cervical spine MRI (CSMRI) after negative CSCT when there is persistent clinical concern for occult trauma related injury. The purpose of this study is to examine the utility of CSMRI for detection of occult injury in blunt trauma patients after negative CSCT. Materials and methodsWe reviewed records for 7,301 patients admitted for blunt trauma (November 2007–December 2013) and identified 259 who underwent CSMRI after a negative CSCT. These CSMRIs were reviewed to determine the number and type of significant CT occult injuries identified and clinical indications that led to CSMRI acquisition. Results and conclusionsCSMRI detected significant injuries following negative CSCT in 31% (81/259) of patients. There were 15 cord contusions/infarcts, 9 bone contusions/fractures, 7 spinal canal hemorrhages and 66 soft tissue injuries. Upper extremity neurological deficit had greatest positive predictive value (PPV) for detection of CT-occult injury on CSMRI of 43% (23/53), followed by equivocal CSCT findings (38%, 18/47), presence of extra-cervical injuries (34%, 20/58), midline cervical tenderness (20%, 17/85), and isolated lower extremity neurological deficit (0%, 0/16). CSMRI is recommended following negative CSCT in the evaluation of blunt cervical spine trauma when appropriate clinical concerns are present.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.