Abstract
Ecological segregation among coexisting seabird species can occur due to morpho- logical and behavioral differences. This segregation is especially important as it reduces competi- tion during the breeding season, when birds are central-place foragers. Furthermore, seasonal variation in oceanographic processes may change prey availability and shape seabird community trophic structure and species isotopic niche. We used stable isotope analyses of seabird whole blood and prey muscle in 5 tropical seabird communities representing 12 species (Charadri- iformes, Phaethontiformes, Procellariiformes and Suliformes) inhabiting 5 offshore islands off Brazil from 00°55' N to 20° 30' S and 65 to 1160 km from the coast. We evaluated how community trophic structure was correlated with morphology (body mass and bill length), and we verified seasonal variation in isotopic niche in 2 communities. Overall, seabird trophic position (TP) was positively correlated with body size, with frigatebirds and boobies occupying a higher TP than noddies and terns. Structuring of seabird communities according to body size probably occurred due to consumption of prey of different sizes and TP, which contributed to niche segregation by reducing interspecific competition during the breeding season. All species showed isotopic niche segregation at 2 islands, and ~60 to 70% of species segregated at the other islands, except at Atol das Rocas, where 43% of species segregated. Niche overlap occurred mainly among closely related species at Atol das Rocas, Fernando de Noronha and Trindade. The isotopic niche and TP changed across islands for all 3 boobies (red-footed Sula sula, brown S. leucogaster and masked S. dactylatra), brown noddy Anous stolidus and red-billed tropicbird Phaethon aethereus; these factors also changed seasonally in other species, such as in magnificent frigatebird Fregata mag- nificens, brown booby, both the red-billed P. aethereus and white-tailed P. lepturus tropicbirds and both the brown A. stolidus and black Anous minutus noddies. Such changes probably occurred due to differences in prey availability, opportunistic behavior (e.g. feeding on fishery dis- cards) and/or local foraging and diet specialization.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.