Abstract

We present results of a pulsar population synthesis study that incorporates a number of recent developments and some significant improvements over our previous study. We have included the results of the Parkes multi-beam pulsar survey in our select group of nine radio surveys, doubling our sample of radio pulsars. We adopted with some modifications the radio beam geometry of Arzoumanian, Chernoff & Cordes (2002). For the $\gamma$-ray beam, we have assumed the slot gap geometry described in the work of Muslimov & Harding (2003). To account for the shape of the distribution of radio pulsars in the $\dot P-P$ diagram, we continue to find that decay of the magnetic field on a timescale of 2.8 Myr is needed. With all nine surveys, our model predicts that EGRET should have seen 7 radio-quiet (below the sensitivity of these radio surveys) and 19 radio-loud $\gamma$-ray pulsars. AGILE (nominal sensitivity map) is expected to detect 13 radio-quiet and 37 radio-loud $\gamma$-ray pulsars, while GLAST, with greater sensitivity is expected to detect 276 radio-quiet and 344 radio-loud $\gamma$-ray pulsars. When the Parkes multi-beam pulsar survey is excluded, the ratio of radio-loud to radio-quiet $\gamma$-ray pulsars decreases, especially for GLAST. The decrease for EGRET is 45%, implying that some fraction of EGRET unidentified sources are radio-loud $\gamma$-ray pulsars. In the radio geometry adopted, short period pulsars are core dominated. Unlike the EGRET $\gamma$-ray pulsars, our model predicts that when two $\gamma$-ray peaks appear in the pulse profile, a dominant radio core peak appears in between the $\gamma$-ray peaks. Our findings suggest that further improvements are required in describing both the radio and $\gamma$-ray geometries.

Highlights

  • Rotation-powered pulsars are the brightest class of y-ray sources detected by the Compton y-Ray Observatory (CGRO)

  • To show the overall effect of the reduction of the radio luminosity used in ACC, we show in Figure 7 the comparisons of the distributions for the pulsar distance, flux at 1400 MHz and dispersion measure (DM) for 620 pulsars detected with only the Parkes multi-beam pulsar survey (PMBPS) and an equal number simulated pulsars for this survey alone

  • We have included radio and y-ray beam geometries into our Monte Carlo code that simulates population statistics for radio and y-ray pulsars, making predictions for the number of radio-quiet and radio-loud y-ray pulsars detected by the instruments: EGRET, AGILE and GLAST

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Rotation-powered pulsars are the brightest class of y-ray sources detected by the Compton y-Ray Observatory (CGRO). Population synthesis studies of radio and y-ray pulsars can predict the number of radio-loud and radio-quiet y-ray pulsar detections expected by different telescopes, assuming different models for radio and y-ray emission. Polar cap and outer gap models of y-ray emission make very different predictions of the number of radio-loud and radio-quiet y-ray pulsars. There have been a number of new developments in both radio pulsar observation and analysis, and in y-ray pulsar theory since we completed our initial population study. We are able to address the question of how many EGRET unidentified sources are expected to be radio-loud or radio-quiet y-ray pulsars in the polar cap model. We can make more accurate estimates of the numbers of radio-loud or radio-quiet y-ray pulsars detectable by the AGILE and GLAST telescopes

Radio Emission Geometry
Gamma-ray Emission Geometry
Curvature Radiation
Synchrotron Radiation
Monte Carlo Simulations
Comparison group of pulsars in the ATNF catalog
Flux sensitivity of the Parkes multi-beam pulsar survey
Gamma-ray Thresholds
New distance model
Initial period distributions
Decay of the Magnetic Field
Supernova kick velocity distribution
Reduction of the radio luminosity
Results
Discussion
I I Ill
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.