Abstract

To investigate the changes in expression level of human leucocyte antigen-DR (HLA-DR) on CD14(+) monocyte (CD14(+)/HLA-DR) in the patients after orthotopic liver transplantation, and its role in monitoring postoperative infection. Sixty-three patients with liver transplantation were divided into three groups, non-infection group with 47 cases, infection group with 10 cases and septic shock group with 6 cases [according to the definition of septic shock of American College of Chest Physicians/Society for Critical Care Medicine (ACCP/SCCM)]. CD14(+)/HLA-DR expression ratio was assessed with flow cytometer, and its clinical implication was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve assay. CD14(+)/HLA-DR expression ratio in infection group [(29.6+/-7.2)%] and septic shock group [(16.3+/-10.5)%] were significantly lower than that in non-infection group [(62.3+/-18.3)%, both P<0.01], but no significant difference of CD14(+)/HLA-DR expression ratio was found between infection group and septic shock group (P=0.128). Total area under ROC curve of CD14(+)/HLA-DR expression ratio for the infection was 0.965, its sensitivity and specificity at 36.35% cut off were 100.0% and 93.6%, respectively. Total area under ROC curve of CD14(+)/HLA-DR expression ratio to predict septic shock was 0.968, its sensitivity and specificity at 31.97% cut off were 100.0% and 87.7%, respectively. Comparing the change of CD14(+)/HLA-DR expression, it was lower in the infection group and septic shock group (P<0.05 and P<0.01), and the expression rate was lowest during period of serious infection in the two groups [infection group: (29.6+/-7.2)%, septic shock group: (16.3+/-0.5)%, all P<0.01]. For the patients with possible infection after liver transplantation, sequential assessment of CD14(+)/HLA-DR expression ratio would be a good marker for the judgment of patient's conditions and outcome. CD14(+)/HLA-DR expression ratio below 36.35% could be used as the prewarning value for the diagnosis of postoperative infection, and 31.97% could be used as the critical value for the diagnosis of septic shock.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.