Abstract

Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) is a devastating disease. Emerging evidence has indicated that the apolipoprotein E (ApoE) genotype might be associated with the risk of aSAH as well as complications and outcomes after aSAH, although the results remain controversial. We searched published literature on PubMed, Embase, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Wanfang database to identify studies involving the ApoE genotype and aSAH. A meta-analysis was performed to summarize the relationship between ApoE genotype and aSAH, including susceptibility, complications, and prognosis. Eighteen studies were considered eligible for inclusion. Generally, ε4 carriers had increased risk of aSAH (odds ratio [OR] 1.23, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01-1.49). White patients with the ε2/ε2 genotype had a greater risk of aSAH (OR 3.38, 95% CI 1.13-10.11). The patients with aSAH carrying the ε4 allele had an increased risk of poor outcome (OR 2.21, 95% CI 1.21-4.05) compared with non-ε4 carriers, especially in Asian patients (OR 4.99, 95% CI 1.73-14.40). ApoE ε4 carriers have increased risk of delayed ischemic neurologic deficit compared with non-ε4 carriers in the overall population. No significant difference was detected regarding the effect of certain ApoE genotypes on aSAH admission severity, rebleeding, or cerebral vasospasm after aSAH. We found that the ApoE genotype was significantly associated with aSAH risk, whereas its effect on certain ethnic populations differs. Patient carrying the ε4 allele might have a worse outcome, whereas current evidence was insufficient to prove the association between ApoE genotypes and post-SAH complications.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.