Abstract

Michael Polanyi has argued that commitment has an essential role to play in the scientific enterprise. Commitment plays an essential role first in the scientist's re? lation to the cause of science. Science is an enterprise committed to the search for truth, and if you want to be a scientist, you must devote yourself to this cause by declaring your loyalty to it. Although there is no formalized oath, as in medicine, a similar commitment is required. To become a scientist is to enter, as it were, a covenant, to promise to oneself and to the community of scientists that he will not allow his natural desires for all kinds of personal profits to interfere with his ser? vice to his cause?the search after truth. And no matter how impersonal all the objects and ends of science may be, the scientist himself still remains a person of whom the responsible act of commitment to a cause beyond himself is required. Not only does Polanyi argue that a scientist qua scientist must be committed to the cause of science; he also claims that commitment plays an essential role in the actual pursuit of scientific knowledge, i.e. in discovery, observation, verification, theory construction, and the like. Polanyi contends indeed that scientific inquiry is possible only in such a context of commitment. Recognizing the hazards of com? mitment Polanyi maintains that the risks involved in it are necessary if science is to proceed. He says believe, that in spite of the hazards involved, I am called upon to search for the truth and state my findings. This sentence summarizing my programme, conveys an ultimate belief which I find myself holding (Polanyi,

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call