Abstract

The current study aimed to identify the role ambiguity and its relation to the psychological pressures among school counselors in the cities of Makkah and Jeddah. In order to achieve the objectives of the study, the descriptive method was used. The sample was chosen randomly among the school counselors in Makkah and Jeddah (100 school counselors). The study used two measures to obtain the results (The preparation of the ambiguity of the role (preparation of Jumaili and Bijari, 2008) and the measure of chronic psychological stress (the preparation of Schultz and Baker and the translation by Kalioubi and Tangor, 2014), the results of the search found that: -There is a statistically significant relationship between the role ambiguity and psychological pressure in the research sample -There were no statistically significant differences between the school counselors on the role ambiguity due to the specialization -There were statistically significant differences between the school counselors on the role ambiguity according to the experience The differences were for the benefit of the less experience. -There were statistically significant differences between the specialized and non-specialist school counselors in the level of psychological pressure. The differences were for the benefit of the non-specialist study sample -There are statistically significant differences in the level of psychological pressure according to the experience of the school counselors and The differences were for the benefit of the less experience.

Highlights

  • The current study aimed to identify the role ambiguity and its relation to the psychological pressures among school counselors in the cities of Makkah and Jeddah

  • In order to achieve the objectives of the study, the descriptive method was used

  • The differences were for the benefit of the non-specialist study sample -There are statistically significant differences in the level of psychological pressure according to the experience of the school counselors and The differences were for the benefit of the less experience

Read more

Summary

Introduction

‫‪ .2‬بالنسبة لنقص الاعتراف الاجتماعي‪:‬‬ ‫توجد فروق ذات دلالة إحصائية في استجابات أفراد عينة الدراسة عند مستوى (‪ )0.01‬و(‪ )0.05‬بين الذين‬ ‫عدد سنوات خبرتهم (أقل من ‪ 5‬سنوات‪ ،‬من ‪ 9 -5‬سنوات‪ ،‬من ‪ 14 - 10‬سنة) من جهة والذين عدد سنوات خبرتهم‬ ‫(‪ 15‬سنة فأكثر) من جهة أخرى وجاءت الفروق لصالح الذين عدد سنوات خبرتهم (أقل من ‪ 5‬سنوات) أي أنهم أكثر‬ ‫عرضة للضغوط من غيرهم وهذا يعني أن عدد سنوات الخبرة له تأثير في مستوى تعرضهم للضغوط بالنسبة للأعباء‬ ‫الوظيفية التي توكل إليهم فنجد أن ذوي عدد سنوات الخبرة المرتفعة أقل تعرض ًا للضغوط من ذوي عدد سنوات‬

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.