Abstract

In modern democracies, local residents’ awareness concerning their participation in the decision-making process is becoming increasingly important. The expanding range of instruments provided by existing law enables them to claim their rights not only by means of a system of legal complaints, but to take advantage of the privilege of civil disobedience, and also to become involved in lobbying. This particular aspect of activity has been observed recently, when changes in architectural developments, expansion of motorways, erection of public facilities, and changes of the use of land to serve a different purpose has resulted in the greater public interest sometimes losing priority, at least in the eyes of individual citizens or from the point of view of their interests. Practice is an important factor for citizens to become more and more aware of the opportunities to apply legislative solutions in order to express their approval or disapproval of the changes proposed for a particular location, especially when these concern the immediate neighborhood and are related to residential conditions, development of infrastructure, and investment plans. Experience shows that, as time goes by, we are becoming more involved in the defense of ‘local public interest’. The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate how local communities and individuals take advantage of the privilege of participating in the process of applying legally sanctioned solutions to the establishment of spatial management plans at the district level and what instruments they use most frequently.

Highlights

  • The expanding range of instruments provided by existing law enables them to claim their rights by means of a system of legal complaints, but to take advantage of the privilege of civil disobedience, and to become involved in lobbying. This particular aspect of activity has been observed recently, when changes in architectural developments, expansion of motorways, erection of public facilities, and changes of the use of land to serve a different purpose has resulted in the greater public interest sometimes losing priority, at least in the eyes of individual citizens or from the point of view of their interests

  • Practice is an important factor for citizens to become more and more aware of the opportunities to apply legislative solutions in order to express their approval or disapproval of the changes proposed for a particular location, especially when these concern the immediate neighborhood and are related to residential conditions, development of infrastructure, and investment plans

  • Experience shows that, as time goes by, we are becoming more involved in the defense of ‘local public interest’

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Przeprowadzenie procedury legislacyjnej zawsze budzi wiele kontrowersji, chocia¿by z uwagi na powodowanie zmian, czêsto wywieraj1cych istotny wp3yw na plany perspektywiczne rozwoju tego obszaru, jego przeznaczenie czy kierunek, który realizowany bêdzie w najbli¿szych latach, a tak¿e rozwi1zania przyjmowane w zakresie prawa powszechnie obowi1zuj1cego, które powoduj[1] skutki nieprzewidziane nawet w fazie tworzenia projektu planu zagospodarowania przestrzennego, istotnie modyfikuj1ce dotychczasowe stanowiska czy preferencje lokalnego spo3eczeñstwa.

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.