Abstract

ABSTRACT As part of reliability-based design acceptance criteria, probabilistic slope stability analysis is increasingly being used for open-pit slope design. This analysis evaluates the mean factor of safety, probability of failure, and coefficient of variation for the resulting probability density function of factor of safety values. Estimating rock mass strength variability is crucial. Hoek–Brown criteria are commonly used strength parameters, as are equivalent Mohr–Coulomb parameters (calculated from Hoek–Brown), particularly for probabilistic slope stability analysis. This article describes these two strength criteria when considering univariate and bivariate distributions of the unconfined compressive strength and rock material constant. Results demonstrate differences in the variability of the equivalent Mohr–Coulomb parameters under different dependence considerations than the Hoek–Brown parameters, potentially affecting the calculated probability of failure and factor of safety results. Furthermore, they highlight an inherent correlation between Mohr–Coulomb parameters that derives from the algorithm used to calculate them from Hoek–Brown criteria. This inherent correlation is important to obtain mean factors of safety, probabilities of failure, and coefficients of variation that are consistent with the variability in Hoek–Brown parameters estimated by the practitioner and are, therefore, key to informed implementation of reliability-based design acceptance criteria.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call