Abstract
The recent Pahang-Selangor raw water transfer tunnel project had resulted in a large amount of rock mass classification data for the assessment of the rock mass class required for the design of tunnel support system. In this project, a rock mass classification by Japan Highway Public Corporation (JH) has been used to assess the rock mass class using geological mapping and geological documentation of the tunnel face and the side walls of the excavated tunnels. Although JH classification had been used for this project, other forms of classification using different criteria from Rock Mass Rating (RMR) and Q-System have also been widely used for tunnelling project all over the world. Since there have been few studies on the relationships among such different criteria of the classification systems, this study mainly focuses on the comparison between the JH and RMR classification systems for the water transfer tunnel. From the correlation analysis among the criteria used in both JH and RMR classification systems, there is higher correlation if the rock mass is in relatively good condition. It was also found that there is less consistency between JH and RMR classifications in the region of ‘poor rock’. However, the correlation between both classification systems is still considered suitable to be used in this tunnelling project.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.