Abstract

Abstract Samples were obtained from three baked contacts and one lava flow along the upper Turonian-lower Coniacian Tovuz section, two baked contacts along the upper Coniacian-lower Santonian Paravakar section in the northern part of Armenia, and three baked contacts along the Titonian-Valanginian Kafan section in southern Armenia. A total of 130 samples were studied. Updated mean paleomagnetic poles were calculated for the Upper Cretaceous Tovuz-Paravakar sections (65.6°N, 162.2°E, A95 = 4.3, paleolatitude = 27.0 ± 3.4°) and the Upper Jurassic-Lower Cretaceous Kafan section (61.7°N, 158.9°E, A95 = 4.8°, paleolatitude = 24.7 ± 3.8°). Paleointensity determinations could be estimated from two of the upper Cretaceous and three of the Upper Jurassic-Lower Cretaceous baked contacts, corresponding to a 30% success rate. The mean virtual dipole moments obtained were low (1.7-5.5 × 1022 A m2), which is in agreement with data published by Bol’shakov and Solodovnikov (1981a, 1983) for the same sections (3.0-4.4 × 1022 A m2). Our results support the hypothesis of the Mesozoic Dipole Low, even though the overall data are widely dispersed.

Highlights

  • Knowledge of the basic characteristics of the ancient geomagnetic field provides valuable information about the formation and evolution of the solid inner core, mantle, and outer shells of the Earth

  • We present the paleointensity results obtained on part of the Armenian collection, mainly baked contacts

  • The evidence for the primary origin of the characteristic remanent magnetization (ChRM) of these rocks is a good argument for considering these rocks for paleointensity experiments

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Knowledge of the basic characteristics of the ancient geomagnetic field provides valuable information about the formation and evolution of the solid inner core, mantle, and outer shells of the Earth. The baked contacts from the Kafan section had a mean ChRM direction (Fig. 3(e, f)) that was statistically indistinguishable (γ /γc = 12.7◦/14.3◦; McFadden and McElhinny, 1990) from that obtained earlier by Bol’shakov and Solodovnikov (1983), after seven outliers with westerly declinations had been removed from the data set (see Fig. 3(e)). These directions, significantly different from all other normal and reverse directions, do not likely reflect the true direction of the ancient geomagnetic field and were interpreted by Bol’shakov and Solodovnikov (1983) as reflecting a transitional state of the geomagnetic field. Curie temperatures estimated from the Mrs(T ) and NRM(T ) thermodemagnetization curves agree well with those determined from the Ms(T ) curves, thereby confirming cation-deficient magnetite as the main carrier of the magnetic remanence

Paravakar section
Kafan section
Discussion and Conclusions

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.