Abstract

Co-existence between potentially competing newt species can lead to niche differentiation (e.g., in terms of diet shifts). This may cause adaptive responses involving changes in head shape. Here, we tested the hypothesis: the head shape of Lissotriton montandoni is different in conditions of co-occurrence with Ichthyosaura alpestris than in conditions in which other newt species are absent. We analysed images depicting head shape of specimens of I. alpestris and L. montandoni from a museum collection. All specimens of I. alpestris originated in a habitat where L. montandoni also occurred, whereas specimens of L. montandoni derived from populations that cohabited with I. alpestris and populations in which the presence of another newt species was not recorded. In each image, landmarks and semilandmarks were digitised. Females of L. montandoni from the population where I. alpestris also occurred were characterised by more massive heads and longer mouths in lateral views than females from sites where no other newt species occurred. Significant differences in head shape were also found when analysing ventral views between these species when they occupied the same habitat. We confirmed that the head shape of female L. montandoni differs between conditions of co-occurrence and absence of I. alpestris; no differences were found for males. A differently shaped head may be an adaptation to diet; L. montandoni females with longer mouths and more robust basal parts of the head can feed on larger invertebrates and compete more effectively with I. alpestris. The co-existence of newt species should be taken into account in future ecomorphological studies.

Highlights

  • Skull components in newts seem to be primarily related to foraging and feeding strategies (Rafinski and Pecio 1989; Malmgren and Thollesson 1999)

  • All specimens of I. alpestris originated in a habitat where L. montandoni occurred, whereas specimens of L. montandoni derived from populations that cohabited with I. alpestris and populations in which the presence of another newt species was not recorded

  • The Procrustes MANOVA test revealed no significant differences in the lateral and ventral views of head shape in L. montandoni between two habitats in which co-occurrence of another newt species was not recorded

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Skull components in newts seem to be primarily related to foraging and feeding strategies (Rafinski and Pecio 1989; Malmgren and Thollesson 1999). In spite of their close kinship and many synapomorphic features, to date patterns of sexual dimorphism in skull form between these species has not been determined (Ivanovicand Kalezic 2012). In such studies, it is difficult to ascertain whether observed differences in head shape are due to sexual or ecological selection (Alcorn et al 2013), especially given that head shape variation differs significantly between species and even between clutches within species, i.e., clutch effects. Variability in body shape and size can be a product of inter- and intraspecific interactions associated with occupancy of different niches in the presence of competitors (Adams and Rohlf 2000; Kniha et al 2013). Body size affects the anatomy of newts (Ivanovicand Kalezic 2012), and a diverse habitat (in the context of the presence of other newt species) may influence the morphology of newts’ heads

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call