Abstract
Photometric stereo (PST) is a widely used technique of estimating surface normals from an image set. However, it often produces inaccurate results for non-Lambertian surface reflectance. In this study, PST is reformulated as a sparse recovery problem where non-Lambertian errors are explicitly identified and corrected. We show that such a problem can be accurately solved via a greedy algorithm called orthogonal matching pursuit (OMP). The performance of OMP is evaluated on synthesized and real-world datasets: we found that the greedy algorithm is overall more robust to non-Lambertian errors than other state-of-the-art sparse approaches with little loss of efficiency. Along with providing an overview of current methods, novel contributions in this paper are as follows: we propose an alternative sparse formulation for PST; in previous PST studies (Wu et al., Robust photometric stereo via low-rank matrix completion and recovery, 2010), (S. Ikehata et al., Robust photometric stereo using sparse regression, 2012), the surface normal vector and the error vector are treated as two entities and are solved independently. In this study, we convert their formulation into a new canonical form of the sparse recovery problem by combining the two vectors into one large vector in a new “stacked” formulation in this domain. This allows for a large repertoire of existing sparse recovery algorithms to be more straightforwardly applied to the PST problem. In our application of the OMP greedy algorithm, we show that greedy solvers can indeed be applied, with this study supplying the first of such attempt at employing greedy approaches to estimate surface normals within the framework of PST. We numerically compare the performance of several normal vector recovery methods. Most notably, this is the first detailed test on complex images of the normal estimation accuracy of our previously proposed method, least median of squares (LMS).
Highlights
Shading in 2D images provides a valuable visual cue for understanding the spatial structure of objects
4.4 Summary Based on the experimental results above, we have come to the conclusion that our greedy algorithm overall has a higher accuracy than L1 minimization and sparse Bayesian learning (SBL) with a comparable efficiency, though orthogonal matching pursuit (OMP) may be less robust in poorly illuminated regions
5 Conclusions In this study, the classical Photometric Stereo (PST) is reformulated in terms of the canonical form of sparse recovery, and a greedy algorithm—OMP—is applied to solve the problem
Summary
Shading in 2D images provides a valuable visual cue for understanding the spatial structure of objects. We again adopt the Lambertian model, but solve for the normal vectors via a sparse representation framework that estimates both the normals and non-Lambertian errors at the same time. This sparse method is more closely related to the statistical-based methods. The classical PST adopts three lights ( three observations of luminance at each pixel location) [15] to solve for the 3D normal vectors. Suppose there are n lights ( n equations for each pixel): the per-pixel number of unknowns would be n + 3 (three normal vector components and n non-Lambertian errors). We employ a modified form of the sparse representation given in [2], but solve it via a different approach—greedy sparse recovery algorithms
Published Version (Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.