Abstract

Computationally expensive models are increasingly employed in the design process of engineering products and systems. Robust design in particular aims to obtain designs that exhibit near-optimal performance and low variability under uncertainty. Surrogate models are often employed to imitate the behaviour of expensive computational models. Surrogates are trained from a reduced number of samples of the expensive model. A crucial component of the performance of a surrogate is the quality of the training set. Problems occur when sampling fails to obtain points located in an area of interest and/or where the computational budget only allows for a very limited number of runs of the expensive model. This paper employs a Gaussian process emulation approach to perform efficient single-loop robust optimisation of expensive models. The emulator is enhanced to propagate input uncertainty to the emulator output, allowing single-loop robust optimisation. Further, the emulator is trained with multi-fidelity data obtained via adaptive sampling to maximise the quality of the training set for the given computational budget. An illustrative example is presented to highlight how the method works, before it is applied to two industrial case studies.

Highlights

  • The chief aim of engineering design is to create systems that satisfy specific performance objectives and constraints over a period of time

  • The benefits of robust design include the assurance of high performance regardless of a variety of unknown factors and occurrences throughout the system’s life cycle

  • Robust design is essentially a traditional optimisation task, but with an added constraint relating to the performance variability, or robustness, within some predefined neighbourhood of the input

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The chief aim of engineering design is to create systems that satisfy specific performance objectives and constraints over a period of time. There exist many feasible designs that satisfy the required objectives. For this reason, it is necessary to choose an optimal design according to some criterion. Ryan [3] employed a probability distribution estimation method to obtain an approximate distribution of the performance within the neighbourhood. Another approach utilised the Taylor expansion of the expectation and variance of the performance and attempted to minimise both criteria simultaneously. Several papers chose to optimise the worst-case scenario rather than any sort of averaged performance [4,5]

Objectives
Methods
Findings
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.