Abstract

study of mapping and interaction of co-localized proteins at a sub-cellular level is important for understanding complex biological phenomena. One of the recent techniques to map co-localized proteins is to use the standard immuno-fluorescence microscopy in a cyclic manner (Nat Biotechnol 24:1270–8, 2006; Proc Natl Acad Sci 110:11982–7, 2013). Unfortunately, these techniques suffer from variability in intensity and positioning of signals from protein markers within a run and across different runs. Therefore, it is necessary to standardize protocols for preprocessing of the multiplexed bioimaging (MBI) data from multiple runs to a comparable scale before any further analysis can be performed on the data. In this paper, we compare various normalization protocols and propose on the basis of the obtained results, a robust normalization technique that produces consistent results on the MBI data collected from different runs using the Toponome Imaging System (TIS). Normalization results produced by the proposed method on a sample TIS data set for colorectal cancer patients were ranked favorably by two pathologists and two biologists. We show that the proposed method produces higher between class Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence and lower within class KL divergence on a distribution of cell phenotypes from colorectal cancer and histologically normal samples.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13040-016-0088-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Highlights

  • The study of co-localized proteins at the subcellular level is key to our understanding of the functional relationships between proteins in abnormal cells in complex diseases such as cancer, as proteins interact together at sub-cellular level to perform cell functions

  • We focus on the standardization of normalization protocols for the multiplexed bioimaging (MBI) data collected from fluorescence microscopy based systems with particular emphasis on data generated from the Toponome Imaging System (TIS)

  • To minimize the effect of unknown variations in the data we start our analysis with four MBIs from the same patient, two each of cancerous and adjacent healthy tissue samples

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The study of co-localized proteins at the subcellular level is key to our understanding of the functional relationships between proteins in abnormal cells in complex diseases such as cancer, as proteins interact together at sub-cellular level to perform cell functions. Different technologies have been developed in the recent years allowing simultaneous imaging of the same tissue specimen with several stains or markers This makes it possible to study co-localized protein patterns at the cellular and sub-cellular levels, potentially leading to the discovery of functional protein complexes, protein hubs, stem cell niche, interactions between neighboring cells in cancerous tissue, novel cancer subtypes, and multiplex biomarkers for a particular subtype of cancer [1]. Some of the popular multiplexed bioimaging (MBI) techniques are based on immuno-fluorescence microscopy [2,3,4], mass cytometry [5,6,7], Raman spectroscopy [8] and Ion-beam imaging [9] All of these techniques require a standard laboratory procedure to prepare a sample before data. Since the co-location of the signals and signal intensities are of primary concern, the MBIs must be aligned in two domains, the spatial domain (a problem that is usually referred to as the signal registration) and the intensity domain (the problem of signal normalization), so that the signal intensities of any given sub-cellular location or ROIs (regions of interest) can be compared between different data sets

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call