Abstract
A principal needs to make a decision, and contracts with an expert, who can obtain information relevant to the decision by exerting costly effort. The principal can incentivize effort by paying a reward based on the expert's reported information and on the true state of nature, which is revealed ex post. Both parties are financially risk-neutral, and payments are constrained by limited liability. The principal is uncertain about the expert's information acquisition technology: she knows some actions (experiments) that he can take to obtain information, but there may also be other experiments available. The principal seeks robustness to this uncertainty, and so evaluates any incentive contract using a worst-case criterion. Under quite general conditions, we show that the optimal contract is a restricted-investment contract, in which the expert chooses from a subset of the decisions available to the principal, and is then rewarded proportionally to the value of his designated decision in the realized state.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.