Abstract

Increasing global warming, climate change and stringent governmental legislations are driving industry practitioners and decision makers to implement various strategies to reduce carbon emissions. One of the effective approaches to mitigate carbon emissions is the implementation of closed-loop supply chain (CLSC). The key motivation for considering multiple recovery options in the CLSC is to capture the remaining economic value and to reduce carbon emissions in the collection and recovery operations. Customer's willingness to return used product depends on the acquisition price and nearness to the collection center. This research proposes a deterministic mixed-integer linear programming (MILP) model for a multi-period and multi-product CLSC network under carbon pricing and carbon trading policies consideration. The model includes different acquisition price for returned products and multiple recovery options. Further, the study takes into consideration uncertainty in procurement cost, demand, and quantity of returned products. A robust optimization approach is adopted to address uncertainty in network parameters. Numerical results show that the proposed model captures trade-offs between total cost and carbon emission. Overall, the study reveals that the carbon trading policy incurs relatively lower total cost compared to the carbon pricing policy. Repair and recycling activities in the reverse supply chain contribute significantly to the total cost and carbon emission. This study provide evidence that it is possible to achieve an optimal CLSC network with reduced carbon emission at a moderate total supply chain cost. The proposed model could be used to guide firms to choose an appropriate budget of uncertainty toward achieving a robust supply chain network.

Highlights

  • Growing environmental concerns, stringent governmental legislations and increasing social expectation have motivated Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs) to pay attention to reverse logistics in addition to forward supply chain (SC) network

  • A different acquisition price is offered based on the quality level of the returned products

  • This paper implemented this approach to study the impact of recovery options, carbon emission policies, and uncertainty on the supply chain network design (SCND)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Stringent governmental legislations and increasing social expectation have motivated Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs) to pay attention to reverse logistics in addition to forward supply chain (SC) network. (ii) reusing of recovered parts and materials in the forward flow of the network. This could lead to saving in production cost and improve their competitiveness. The successful establishment of a closed loop supply chain (CLSC) network requires appropriate reverse logistics infrastructures and needs efficient collection and recovery plan of used products. The prime importance of used products recovery is for: (i) promoting environmental sustainability, and (ii) maximizing value creation of products beyond their useable life cycle. Toward this end, there is a need to have a plan to increase the quantity and quality of returning used products

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call