Abstract

Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) based assessment of white matter fiber tract integrity can support the diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease (AD). The use of DTI as a biomarker, however, depends on its applicability in a multicenter setting accounting for effects of different MRI scanners. We applied multivariate machine learning (ML) to a large multicenter sample from the recently created framework of the European DTI study on Dementia (EDSD). We hypothesized that ML approaches may amend effects of multicenter acquisition. We included a sample of 137 patients with clinically probable AD (MMSE 20.6±5.3) and 143 healthy elderly controls, scanned in nine different scanners. For diagnostic classification we used the DTI indices fractional anisotropy (FA) and mean diffusivity (MD) and, for comparison, gray matter and white matter density maps from anatomical MRI. Data were classified using a Support Vector Machine (SVM) and a Naïve Bayes (NB) classifier. We used two cross-validation approaches, (i) test and training samples randomly drawn from the entire data set (pooled cross-validation) and (ii) data from each scanner as test set, and the data from the remaining scanners as training set (scanner-specific cross-validation). In the pooled cross-validation, SVM achieved an accuracy of 80% for FA and 83% for MD. Accuracies for NB were significantly lower, ranging between 68% and 75%. Removing variance components arising from scanners using principal component analysis did not significantly change the classification results for both classifiers. For the scanner-specific cross-validation, the classification accuracy was reduced for both SVM and NB. After mean correction, classification accuracy reached a level comparable to the results obtained from the pooled cross-validation. Our findings support the notion that machine learning classification allows robust classification of DTI data sets arising from multiple scanners, even if a new data set comes from a scanner that was not part of the training sample.

Highlights

  • The newly established diagnostic criteria for Alzheimer’s disease (AD) have stressed the detection of biological markers of disease for early diagnosis, even before the onset of dementia [1,2]

  • We first applied the natural logarithm to the sensitivity values and rescaled them to be between zero and one

  • For the massunivariate Naıve Bayes (NB) classifier we achieved an average accuracy of 70.3% for fractional anisotropy (FA), 69.7% for mean diffusivity (MD), 75.1% for white matter density (WMD) and 71.5% for gray matter density (GMD)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The newly established diagnostic criteria for Alzheimer’s disease (AD) have stressed the detection of biological markers of disease for early diagnosis, even before the onset of dementia [1,2]. Among those biomarkers are MRI derived measures of regional brain atrophy. A promising new imaging marker of AD are measures of structural disconnection using diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), consistent with the pathogenetically early involvement of axonal structures in AD [3]. DTI allows the reconstruction of the main directions of diffusion [4].

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call