Abstract

Background: Morbidity and mortality rates from seasonal and pandemic influenza occur disproportionately in high-risk groups, including Indigenous people globally. Although vaccination against influenza is recommended for those most at risk, studies on immune responses elicited by seasonal vaccines in Indigenous populations are largely missing, with no data available for Indigenous Australians and only one report published on antibody responses in Indigenous Canadians. Methods: We recruited 78 Indigenous and 84 non-Indigenous Australians vaccinated with the quadrivalent influenza vaccine into the LIFT-V cohort, and collected blood to define baseline, early (day 7) and memory (day 28) immune responses. We performed in-depth analyses of T and B cell activation, formation of memory B cells and antibody profiles, and investigated host factors that could contribute to vaccine responses. Findings:We found robust antibody responses to influenza vaccination induced in Indigenous Australians, with activation profiles of circulating T follicular helper type-1 (cT FH 1) cells at the acute response strongly correlating with total change of antibody vaccine titres induced by vaccination. Formation of influenza-specific haemagglutinin (HA)-binding memory B cells was significantly higher in seroconverters compared to non-seroconverters. Back-boosting of antibodies towards previously circulating influenza strains was observed following influenza vaccination. In-depth antibody characterisation revealed a reduction in IgG3 pre- and post-vaccination in the Indigenous Australian population, potentially linked to the increased frequency of G3m21* allotype. Interpretation: Overall, our data provide the first evidence that Indigenous populations elicit robust, broad and prototypical immune responses following immunisation with seasonal inactivated influenza vaccines. Our work strongly supports the recommendation of influenza vaccination to protect Indigenous populations from severe seasonal influenza virus infections and its subsequent complications. Funding: This work was funded by the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Program Grant (#1071916) to KK, NHMRC Project Grant (#1122524) to KK, ST, AM, NHMRC Project Grant (#1141840) to MP, KLF, Clifford Craig Foundation Grant (#145) to KLF, and NHMRC Investigator Grant (#1173871) to KK supported this work. EBC is a NHMRC Peter Doherty Fellow. ST is a NHMRC Career Development Fellow (#1145033). This work is supported by the NHMRC program grant 111 #1149990 (SJK), NHMRC project grant #1162760 (AKW). KK is supported by a NHMRC Senior Research Fellowship (#1102792) and SJK by a NHMRC Senior Principal Research Fellowship (#1136322). LH is supported by the Melbourne International Research Scholarship the Melbourne International Fee Remission Scholarship from The University of Melbourne. CES has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie grant agreement No 792532. The Melbourne WHO Collaborating Centre for Reference Research on Influenza is supported by the Australian Government Department of Health. Declaration of Interest: None to declare. Ethical Approval: All experiments were conducted according to the Declaration of Helsinki principles and NHMRC Code of practice and approved by the University of Melbourne Human Research Ethics Committee (#1955465 and #1441452), the Human Research Ethics Committee of the Northern Territory Department of Health and Menzies School of Health Research (#2012-1928), and the Tasmanian Human Research Ethics Committee (#H0015460).

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call