Abstract

Modern commercial orchards are increasingly adopting trees of SNAP architectures (Simple, Narrow, Accessible, and Productive) as the fruits on such trees are, in general, more easily reachable by human or robotic harvesters. This article presents a methodology that utilizes three dimensional (3D) digitized computer models of high-density pear and cling-peach trees, and fruit positions to quantify the linear fruit reachability (LFR) of such trees, i.e., their reachability by telescoping robot arms. Robot-canopy non-interference geometric constraints were introduced in the simulator, to determine the closest position of the arms' base frames with respect to the trees, inside an orchard row. Also, design constraints for such arms, such as maximum reach, size and type of the gripper, and range of approach directions, were introduced to estimate the effect of each of these constraints on the LFR. Simulations results showed that 85.5% of pears were reachable after harvesting consecutively, at three different approach angles ('passes') with a gripper of size 11 cm and an arm extension of 150 cm. For peaches, after three passes, 83.5% were reachable with a gripper size of 11 cm and an arm extension of 200 cm. LFR increased as the gripper's size approached the maximum fruit size and decreased thereafter. Also, retractive grippers on linear arms yielded more fruit compared to vacuum-tube type grippers. Overall, the results suggested that telescoping arms can be used to harvest certain types of SNAP-style trees. Also, this methodology can be used to guide the design of robotic harvesters, as well as the canopy management practices of fruit trees.

Highlights

  • Manual harvesting is one of the most labor-intensive and costly operations in fresh-market fruit production [1]–[3]

  • The linear fruit reachability Linear Fruit Reachability (LFR)(d1; d2; . . . ; di−1; di) for the ith ‘‘harvesting pass’’ along a direction di was defined as the linear fruit reachability of the fruits remaining on the tree, after fruits that were reachable along vectors d1, d2, . . . , di−1 were removed

  • For the vacuum-type tube gripper, different sizes of gripper are tested to estimate the effect of gripper size on the LFR

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Manual harvesting is one of the most labor-intensive and costly operations in fresh-market fruit production [1]–[3]. As mentioned above, harvesting with such grippers must include a retracting motion, which slows down picking Their smaller size reduces canopyrobot interference, potentially increasing the number of reachable fruits. We refer to such grippers as ‘‘retractinggrippers.’’ In the second approach, the gripper is a vacuum tube with a cross-section larger than the expected largest dimension of all fruits (FIGURE 1).

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.