Abstract

BackgroundRobotic-assisted pancreatic surgery (RPS) has fundamentally developed over the past few years. For subgroups, e.g. elderly patients, applicability and safety of RPS still needs to be defined. Given prognosticated demographic developments, we aim to assess the role of RPS based on preoperative, operative and postoperative parameters.MethodsWe included 129 patients undergoing RPS at our institution between 2017 and 2020. Eleven patients required conversion to open surgery and were excluded from further analysis. We divided patients into two groups; ≥ 70 years old (Group 1; n = 32) and < 70 years old (Group 2; n = 86) at time of resection.ResultsMost preoperative characteristics were similar in both groups. However, number of patients with previous abdominal surgery was significantly higher in patients ≥ 70 years old (78% vs 37%, p < 0.0001). Operative characteristics did not significantly differ between both groups. Although patients ≥ 70 years old stayed significantly longer at ICU (1.8 vs 0.9 days; p = 0.037), length of hospital stay and postoperative morbidity were equivalent between the groups.ConclusionRPS is safe and feasible in elderly patients and shows non-inferiority when compared with younger patients. However, prospectively collected data is needed to define the role of RPS in elderly patients accurately.Trial registration Clinical Trial Register: Deutschen Register Klinischer Studien (DRKS; German Clinical Trials Register). Clinical Registration Number: DRKS00017229 (retrospectively registered, Date of Registration: 2019/07/19, Date of First Enrollment: 2017/10/18).

Highlights

  • The field of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) has developed rapidly over the last decades, becoming state of Hillebrandt et al BMC Surgery (2021) 21:415 minimally invasive procedures for malignant indications [5].One of the latest advances in MIS is robotic-assisted pancreatic surgery (RPS) [6]

  • The first study on Robotic-assisted pancreatic surgery (RPS) was published in 2010 by Buchs et al reporting on 15 robotic-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomies (RPD) in patients ≥ 70 years showing similar outcomes compared with younger patients [7]

  • Our results underline that RPS is safe and feasible, showing noninferiority compared to younger patients

Read more

Summary

Introduction

One of the latest advances in MIS is robotic-assisted pancreatic surgery (RPS) [6]. While initial results seem promising, the exact role and indication for RPS, especially in the elderly patient, still needs a comprehensive assessment. In this regard, previously published experience on RPS remains scarce and is mainly based on a few retrospective studies [7, 8]. The first study on RPS was published in 2010 by Buchs et al reporting on 15 robotic-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomies (RPD) in patients ≥ 70 years showing similar outcomes compared with younger patients [7]. Robotic-assisted pancreatic surgery (RPS) has fundamentally developed over the past few years. We aim to assess the role of RPS based on preoperative, operative and postoperative parameters

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call