Abstract
Abstract This work investigates the potential use of a commercially-available portable photogrammetry system (the MaxSHOT 3D) in industrial robot calibration. To demonstrate the effectiveness of this system, we take the approach of comparing the device with a laser tracker (the FARO laser tracker) by calibrating an industrial robot, with each device in turn, then comparing the obtained robot position accuracy after calibration. As the use of a portable photogrammetry system in robot calibration is uncommon, this paper presents how to proceed. It will cover the theory of robot calibration: the robot's forward and inverse kinematics, the elasto-geometrical model of the robot, the generation and ultimate selection of robot configurations to be measured, and the parameter identification. Furthermore, an experimental comparison of the laser tracker and the MaxSHOT 3D is described. The obtained results show that the FARO laser tracker ION performs slightly better: The absolute positional accuracy obtained with the laser tracker is 0.365 mm and 0.147 mm for the maximum and the mean position errors, respectively. Nevertheless, the results obtained by using the MaxSHOT 3D are almost as good as those obtained by using the laser tracker: 0.469 mm and 0.197 mm for the maximum and the mean position errors, respectively. Performances in distance accuracy, after calibration (i.e. maximum errors), are respectively 0.329 mm and 0.352 mm, for the laser tracker and the MaxSHOT 3D. However, as the validation measurements were acquired with the laser tracker, bias favors this device. Thus, we may conclude that the calibration performances of the two measurement devices are very similar.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have