Abstract

BackgroundLoss of arm function is a common and distressing consequence of stroke. We describe the protocol for a pragmatic, multicentre randomised controlled trial to determine whether robot-assisted training improves upper limb function following stroke.Methods/designStudy design: a pragmatic, three-arm, multicentre randomised controlled trial, economic analysis and process evaluation.Setting: NHS stroke services.Participants: adults with acute or chronic first-ever stroke (1 week to 5 years post stroke) causing moderate to severe upper limb functional limitation.Randomisation groups:1. Robot-assisted training using the InMotion robotic gym system for 45 min, three times/week for 12 weeks2. Enhanced upper limb therapy for 45 min, three times/week for 12 weeks3. Usual NHS care in accordance with local clinical practiceRandomisation: individual participant randomisation stratified by centre, time since stroke, and severity of upper limb impairment.Primary outcome: upper limb function measured by the Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) at 3 months post randomisation.Secondary outcomes: upper limb impairment (Fugl-Meyer Test), activities of daily living (Barthel ADL Index), quality of life (Stroke Impact Scale, EQ-5D-5L), resource use, cost per quality-adjusted life year and adverse events, at 3 and 6 months.Blinding: outcomes are undertaken by blinded assessors.Economic analysis: micro-costing and economic evaluation of interventions compared to usual NHS care. A within-trial analysis, with an economic model will be used to extrapolate longer-term costs and outcomes.Process evaluation: semi-structured interviews with participants and professionals to seek their views and experiences of the rehabilitation that they have received or provided, and factors affecting the implementation of the trial.Sample size: allowing for 10% attrition, 720 participants provide 80% power to detect a 15% difference in successful outcome between each of the treatment pairs. Successful outcome definition: baseline ARAT 0–7 must improve by 3 or more points; baseline ARAT 8–13 improve by 4 or more points; baseline ARAT 14–19 improve by 5 or more points; baseline ARAT 20–39 improve by 6 or more points.DiscussionThe results from this trial will determine whether robot-assisted training improves upper limb function post stroke.Trial registrationISRCTN, identifier: ISRCTN69371850. Registered 4 October 2013.

Highlights

  • Loss of arm function is a common and distressing consequence of stroke

  • Successful outcome definition: baseline Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) 0–7 must improve by 3 or more points; baseline ARAT 8–13 improve by 4 or more points; baseline ARAT 14–19 improve by 5 or more points; baseline ARAT 20–39 improve by 6 or more points. The results from this trial will determine whether robot-assisted training improves upper limb function post stroke

  • Improving arm function has been identified as a research priority by stroke survivors, carers and health professionals who report that current rehabilitation pays insufficient attention to arm recovery [4]

Read more

Summary

Discussion

Robot-assisted training is a promising treatment for improving the upper limb function of patients with moderate to severe upper limb impairment post stroke, but further high-quality research is needed before this technology should be integrated into clinical practice [8]. RATULS is a large, multicentre RCT to determine whether robot-assisted training with the InMotion robotic gym system (MIT-Manus commercial version) improves upper limb function post stroke when compared to an upper limb therapy programme of the same frequency and duration of sessions and usual NHS care. The results from the trial will inform clinicians and commissioners of health care about the clinical effectiveness and costeffectiveness of robot-assisted training. Trial status RATULS commenced recruitment in April 2014. The RATULS trial has recruited 468 patients at the time of submission of this manuscript.

Background
Objectives
Brief name: ‘provide the name or phrase that describes the intervention’
Staff at RATULS NHS study centres: Glasgow study centre
Staff at Newcastle University who contribute to the project
Findings
36. Progress and Safety Reporting
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call