Abstract
Open Anderson-Hynes dismembered pyeloplasty was the criterion standard for ureteropelvic junction obstruction. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty was comparable to open pyeloplasty in success rates while laparoscopic pyeloplasty offered the advantages of decreased morbidity, shorter hospital stay, and quicker recovery. While laparoscopic pyeloplasty was accompanied with the slow learning curve due to technically demanding and time-consuming intracorporal suturing, which has limited its widespread use. Robotic pyeloplasty and laparoscopic pyeloplasty were comparable regarding complication rate, success rate and operative time.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
