Abstract
ObjectivesTo evaluate the outcomes of pre-toilet trained children undergoing RALUR for the treatment of primary VUR at our institution and compare these to an older cohort. Materials and MethodsThis retrospective study analyzed data from a single institution's registry, comparing outcomes between pre-toilet trained and toilet trained children who underwent RALUR for primary VUR. Preoperative parameters, surgical details, and postoperative outcomes were evaluated. ResultsThe study included 158 patients, with 24 in the pre-toilet trained group and 134 in the toilet trained group. Both cohorts exhibited similar demographics and preoperative characteristics. Operative times, complication rates, and surgical outcomes were comparable between the groups, despite the pre-toilet trained group presenting with more severe VUR grades. Incidence of febrile UTI after surgery and need for further intervention did not significantly differ between the cohorts. ConclusionThe current study demonstrates the feasibility, success, and safety of RALUR in pre-toilet trained compared to toilet-trained children and thus support the stance that it is a viable alternative to open surgery.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.