Abstract

The use of intelligent judgment technology to assist in judgment is an inevitable trend in the development of judgment in contemporary social legal cases. Using big data and artificial intelligence technology to accurately determine multiple accusations involved in legal cases is an urgent problem to be solved in legal judgment. The key to solving these problems lies in two points, namely, (1) characterization of legal cases and (2) classification and prediction of legal case data. Traditional methods of entity characterization rely on feature extraction, which is often based on vocabulary and syntax information. Thus, traditional entity characterization often requires extensive energy and has poor generality, thus introducing a large amount of computation and limitation to subsequent classification algorithms. This study proposes an intelligent judgment approach called RnRTD, which is based on the relationship-driven recurrent neural network (rdRNN) and restricted tensor decomposition (RTD). We represent legal cases as tensors and propose an innovative RTD method. RTD has low dependence on vocabulary and syntax and extracts the feature structure that is most favorable for improving the accuracy of the subsequent classification algorithm. RTD maps the tensors, which represent legal cases, into a specific feature space and transforms the original tensor into a core tensor and its corresponding factor matrices. This study uses rdRNN to continuously update and optimize the constraints in RTD so that rdRNN can have the best legal case classification effect in the target feature space generated by RTD. Simultaneously, rdRNN sets up a new gate and a similar case list to represent the interaction between legal cases. In comparison with traditional feature extraction methods, our proposed RTD method is less expensive and more universal in the characterization of legal cases. Moreover, rdRNN with an RTD layer has a better effect than the recurrent neural network (RNN) only on the classification and prediction of multiple accusations in legal cases. Experiments show that compared with previous approaches, our method achieves higher accuracy in the classification and prediction of multiple accusations in legal cases, and our algorithm is more interpretable.

Highlights

  • In contemporary society, the demand for big data assistance in the judgment of legal cases, such as case intelligence research [1] and judgment [2], big data comprehensive supervision, and assistance in handling legal cases, is increasing with the development of big data and artificial intelligence technology

  • Given that multiaccusation judgment based on deep neural network and tensor decomposition is rarely studied, according to the limited tensor decomposition method restricted tensor decomposition (RTD) and the relation-based recurrent neural network relationship-driven recurrent neural network (rdRNN), we use the following method for a comparison with RnRTD proposed in this study: Input: 􏼈(χ(n), L(n))􏼉, where χ(n) represents the legal cases and L(n) represents the category of legal case corresponding to χ(n) according to judgment results. e size of η, 􏼈wr􏼉, 􏽮wf􏽯, 􏼈wi􏼉, 􏼈wo􏼉, 􏼈wc􏼉, 􏼈br􏼉, 􏽮bf􏽯, 􏼈bi􏼉, 􏼈bo􏼉 and 􏼈bc􏼉, where wr [wrh, wrx], wf [wfh, wfx], wi [wih, wix], wo [woh, wox] and wc [wch, wcx] Output: e optimal restricted tensor η, parameters of rdRNN 􏼈wr􏼉, 􏽮wf􏽯, 􏼈wi􏼉, 􏼈wo􏼉, 􏼈wc􏼉 and 􏼈br􏼉, 􏽮bf􏽯, 􏼈bi􏼉, 􏼈bo􏼉, 􏼈bc􏼉

  • Experimental Results and Analysis. is section shows the superiority of the proposed RnRTD method for multiple accusations in legal cases relative to the baseline listed in Section 5.2 and provides the corresponding analysis

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The demand for big data assistance in the judgment of legal cases, such as case intelligence research [1] and judgment [2], big data comprehensive supervision, and assistance in handling legal cases, is increasing with the development of big data and artificial intelligence technology. Legal case multiaccusation judgment business is an important part of the realization of such a project. Legal case multiaccusation judgment technology fully applies big data and artificial intelligence technology to service judgment making, legal case handling [3], and facilitation of the public. Artificial intelligence technology avoids the subjectivity of human beings, performs scientific and accurate analyses of cases from the perspective of cases and laws, and helps judges make objective judgment in legal cases

Objectives
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call