Abstract

Recently, long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) have been shown to play critical regulatory roles in model plants, such as Arabidopsis, rice, and maize. However, the presence of lncRNAs and how they function in fleshy fruit ripening are still largely unknown because fleshy fruit ripening is not present in the above model plants. Tomato is the model system for fruit ripening studies due to its dramatic ripening process. To investigate further the role of lncRNAs in fruit ripening, it is necessary and urgent to discover and identify novel lncRNAs and understand the function of lncRNAs in tomato fruit ripening. Here it is reported that 3679 lncRNAs were discovered from wild-type tomato and ripening mutant fruit. The lncRNAs are transcribed from all tomato chromosomes, 85.1% of which came from intergenic regions. Tomato lncRNAs are shorter and have fewer exons than protein-coding genes, a situation reminiscent of lncRNAs from other model plants. It was also observed that 490 lncRNAs were significantly up-regulated in ripening mutant fruits, and 187 lncRNAs were down-regulated, indicating that lncRNAs could be involved in the regulation of fruit ripening. In line with this, silencing of two novel tomato intergenic lncRNAs, lncRNA1459 and lncRNA1840, resulted in an obvious delay of ripening of wild-type fruit. Overall, the results indicated that lncRNAs might be essential regulators of tomato fruit ripening, which sheds new light on the regulation of fruit ripening.

Highlights

  • Genome-wide transcriptome sequencing has revealed that ~90% of eukaryotic genomes are transcribed (Wilhelm et al, 2008), only 1–2% of the genome encodes proteins (Birney et al, 2007), suggesting the presence of a large proportion of non-coding RNAs

  • Down-regulation of the expression of some novel intergenic long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) in wild-type tomato fruit induced an obvious delay of fruit ripening. These results strongly suggested that lncRNAs play an important role in the regulation of tomato fruit ripening

  • The fold change in the lncRNA expression level of Quantitative reverse transcription–PCR (qRT–PCR) and RNA-Seq was closely correlated (R2=0.76, P

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Genome-wide transcriptome sequencing has revealed that ~90% of eukaryotic genomes are transcribed (Wilhelm et al, 2008), only 1–2% of the genome encodes proteins (Birney et al, 2007), suggesting the presence of a large proportion of non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs). The ‘housekeeping’ ncRNAs include rRNAs, tRNAs, small nuclear RNAs (snRNAs), and small nucleolar RNAs (snoRNAs), whereas the ‘regulatory’ ncRNAs refer to small ncRNAs and long non-coding RNA (lncRNAs) (Kim and Sung, 2012; Zhu and Wang, 2012). It is generally believed that lncRNAs are >200 nucleotides in length and mainly transcribed by RNA polymerase II (Pol II), which are always capped, polyadenylated and frequently spliced (Ulitsky and Bartel, 2013). A few lncRNAs are generated by plant-specific Pol V, capped at the 5′ end and lacking apparent poly(A) tails

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call