RNA-Seq transcriptomic analysis reveals gene expression profiles of acetic acid bacteria under high-acidity submerged industrial fermentation process.

Abstract

Acetic acid bacteria (AAB) are Gram-negative obligate aerobics in Acetobacteraceae family. Producing acetic acid and brewing vinegars are one of the most important industrial applications of AAB, attributed to their outstanding ability to tolerate the corresponding stresses. Several unique acid resistance (AR) mechanisms in AAB have been revealed previously. However, their overall AR strategies are still less-comprehensively clarified. Consequently, omics analysis was widely performed for a better understanding of this field. Among them, transcriptome has recently obtained more and more attention. However, most currently reported transcriptomic studies were conducted under lab conditions and even in low-acidity environment, which may be unable to completely reflect the conditions that AAB confront under industrialized vinegar-brewing processes. In this study, we performed an RNA-Seq transcriptomic analysis concerning AAB’s AR mechanisms during a continuous and periodical industrial submerged vinegar fermentation process, where a single AAB strain performed the fermentation and the acetic acid concentration fluctuated between ~8% and ~12%, the highest acidity as far we know for transcriptomic studies. Samples were directly taken from the initial (CK), mid, and final stages of the same period of the on-going fermentation. 16S rRNA sequence analysis indicated the participation of Komagataeibacter europaeus in the fermentation. Transcriptomic results demonstrated that more genes were downregulated than upregulated at both mid and final stages. Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) enrich analysis reflected that the upregulated genes mainly carried out tricarboxylic acid cycle and oxidative phosphorylation processes, probably implying a considerable role of acetic acid overoxidation in AR during fermentation. Besides, upregulation of riboflavin biosynthesis pathway and two NAD+-dependent succinate-semialdehyde dehydrogenase-coding genes suggested a critical role of succinate oxidation in AR. Meanwhile, downregulated genes were mainly ribosomal protein-coding ones, reflecting that the adverse impact on ribosomes initiates at the transcription level. However, it is ambiguous whether the downregulation is good for stress responding or it actually reflects the stress. Furthermore, we also assumed that the fermentation stages may have a greater effect on gene expression than acidity. Additionally, it is possible that some physiological alterations would affect the AR to a larger extent than changes in gene expression, which suggests the combination of molecular biology and physiology research will provide deeper insight into the AR mechanisms in AAB.