Abstract

A review of the mechanisms of the generation of antiviral immunity in bacteria, plants, invertebrates, and vertebrates directly indicates the leading role of innate immunity. Bornovirus infections in mammals have been proven to be inhibited by the RNA interference mechanism. Authors propose a possible role of innate human immunity in combating viral infections, including SARS-Cov2. This hypothesis is based on the notion that antiviral response involves a molecular mechanism of RNA interference stemming from the specific viral patterns incorporated into host cells’ DNA. Innate immunity plays an important role not only at the first encounter with a viral infection, but also fully participates in the formation of specific immune memory. RNA-interference along with interferon system is integral parts of human anti-viral defense system. The joint work of these systems is considered. Caution is warranted in both PCR testing interpretation and in assessing prospective vaccines. False positive result without any clinical presentation of the disease in some people might mean that PCR test was picking up any specific SARS-Cov2 sequences that already had incorporated into asymptomatic person’s cellular DNA due to the possible RNA-interference based anti-viral immunity. Future vaccines aimed at producing specific antibodies can cause the phenomenon of antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE) of the infection. In ADE virus not only infects susceptible cells through appropriate receptor, but is able to highjack virus-specific antibodies to easily traffic virus bodies inside the monocytes/macrophages, granulocytes, platelets, mast and many more host cells through interaction with Fc and/or complement receptors. It is necessary to draw the attention of medical community, especially practitioners to the role of innate immunity, which is especially important in the current COVID-19 pandemic.

Highlights

  • The ability of innate immunity to remember and learn has been observed and intensively researched across various biological species

  • Reviewing the antiviral defense mechanisms, it is necessary to single out the kingdom of bacteria that use the effective CRISPR-Cas system in the fight against viruses [13]

  • A key role in the fight against viral invasion is played by innate immunity, including physical barriers; anatomical barriers; enzymes of epithelial and phagocytic cells, phagocytes, serum proteins associated with inflammation; antimicrobial peptides of surface and phagocytic granules; cells that release cytokines and inflammatory mediators and cell receptors that sense the characteristic patterns of microorganisms (TLR, NLR, RLR, CLR receptors)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The ability of innate immunity to remember and learn has been observed and intensively researched across various biological species. Invertebrates response to the various IAs by modulating innate defense capacities [2,3,4,5]. Such strong alertness of immune system in invertebrates can last lifelong and further passes vertically and is detectable in offspring up to the third generation [9]. Mackaness 1964 has demonstrated an innate component contribution to the formation of immune memory in vertebrates [10]. Repeated administration of pathogenic microorganisms resulted in recruitment of highly sensitive macrophages, monocytes and NK-cells. Epigenetic changes in the effector cells themselves were noted [11, 12]. A complete overview of the innate memory is beyond the scope of this discussion, but several excellent reviews are available [1, 8, 12]

Antiviral Defense Mechanisms
Hypothesis of Specific Antiviral
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call