Abstract

RNA editing—primarily conversion of adenosine to inosine (A > I)—is a widespread posttranscriptional mechanism, mediated by Adenosine Deaminases acting on RNA (ADAR) enzymes to alter the RNA sequence of primary transcripts. Hence, in addition to somatic mutations and alternative RNA splicing, RNA editing can be a further source for recoding events. Although RNA editing has been detected in many solid cancers and normal tissue, RNA editing in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) has not been addressed so far. We determined global RNA editing and recurrent, recoding RNA editing events from matched RNA-sequencing and whole exome sequencing data in CLL samples from 45 untreated patients. RNA editing was verified in a validation cohort of 98 CLL patients and revealed substantially altered RNA editing profiles in CLL compared with normal B cells. We further found that RNA editing patterns were prognostically relevant. Finally, we showed that ADAR knockout decreased steady state viability of MEC1 cells and made them more susceptible to treatment with fludarabine and ibrutinib in vitro. We propose that RNA editing contributes to the pathophysiology of CLL and targeting the RNA editing machinery could be a future strategy to maximize treatment efficacy.

Highlights

  • Recent data from whole-exome and whole-genome sequencing approaches revealed a complex genomic landscape for many cancer entities [1,2,3]

  • We studied RNA editing in 45 previously untreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) patients prior to first line therapy with fludarabine/rituximab combined with escalating doses of lenalidomide (AGMTREVLIRIT study [18], see Material and Methods)

  • We describe for the first time RNA editing in CLL and defined 19 recurrent, nonsynonymous editing sites within 14 genes

Read more

Summary

1234567890();,: 1234567890();,: Introduction

Recent data from whole-exome and whole-genome sequencing approaches revealed a complex genomic landscape for many cancer entities [1,2,3]. Increased RNA editing was recently detected in many solid cancer entities compared with healthy tissue, which has been attributed to an increased expression of ADAR1 in cancer, the inflammation dependent isoform p150 [7,8,9]. RNA editing has not yet been investigated in this cancer entity and it is unknown how the complex joint effects from genome mutations/aberrations and RNA editing interrelate with clinical parameters, disease progression and response to therapies. We analyzed RNA editing from matched exomes and transcriptomes of 45 previously untreated CLL patients From these data, we established a catalog of recurrent and recoding editing sites in CLL and validated these sites in a second CLL cohort and in normal B cell subsets. Our analysis provides for the first time a detailed insight into RNA editing in CLL and normal B cells, revealing recurrent recoding of conserved sites and its association with clinical parameters in CLL

Materials and methods
Results
A ADAR Exon 2
11.5 Annexin V
Discussion
Compliance with ethical standards
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call