Abstract
ABSTRACTThis article focuses on international intervention into civil conflict by international rivals; that is, the phenomenon of two states, locked in a long-term and ongoing acrimonious relationship, intervening on opposing sides of a civil conflict occurring in a third party. International rivalry, it is argued, is an ongoing strategic relationship in which the push of the past and the pull of the future engenders balancing behaviour vis à vis third-party civil conflicts. This argument is evaluated in the context of three cases of rivalry intervention: Afghanistan (India–Pakistan); Angola (USSR–USA); and Lebanon (Israel–Syria). While rivalry dynamics are not the sole motivator for intervention in each case, rivals do worry about the future, and as a result consider and assess the implications of their opponents’ involvement in a civil conflict in the context of potential future confrontation.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
