Abstract

IntroductionIn patients with refractory or recurrent follicular lymphoma responding to induction therapy with CHOP or rituximab + CHOP, maintenance treatment with rituximab compared to the “observation” option improves both overall survival and progression-free survival. ObjectiveEstimate whether maintenance treatment with rituximab is a cost-effective intervention compared to the clinical practice of “observing” its evolution. MethodPopulation: the EORTC 20981 clinical trial population. Perspective: Spanish National Health System (direct healthcare costs). Design: Incremental cost-effectiveness analysis, with a transition model between states of health. Main variables: cost of gaining a quality-adjusted life year (QALY), per life year gained (LYG) and per progression-free LYG. Premises of the basic case: Weibull distribution for survival extrapolation, 5 year duration of the benefits of the treatment, time horizon of 10 years, and annual discount rate (costs and benefits) of 3.5%. These premises were modified in the sensitivity analyses. ResultsDeterministic analysis: the cost per QALY gained was €9358, €8493 per LYG, and €5485 per progression-free LYG. Probabilistic and sensitivity analysis: they confirmed the stability of the deterministic analysis results. ConclusionsAccording to this model, maintenance treatment with rituximab is cost-effective (cost per LYG <€30 000) in patients with resistant or recurrent follicular lymphoma responding to induction treatment, in comparison to the usual practice of observing patients’ evolution.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call