Abstract

Background: Adolescent pregnancy is a public health concern and many studies have evaluated neonatal outcomes, but few have compared younger adolescents with older using adequate prenatal care.Objective: To compare the risks of adverse neonatal outcomes in younger pregnant adolescents who are properly followed through group prenatal care (GPC) delivered by specialized public services.Methods: This retrospective cohort study followed pregnant adolescents (aged 10–17 years) who received GPC from specialized public services in Brazil from 2009 to 2014. Data were obtained from medical records and through interviews with a multidisciplinary team that treated the patients. The neonatal outcomes (low birth weight, prematurity, Apgar scores with 1 and 5 min, and neonatal death) of newborns of adolescents aged 10–13 years were compared to those of adolescents aged 14–15 years and 16–17 years. Incidence was calculated with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and compared over time using a chi-squared test to observe trends. Poisson Multivariate logistic regression was used to adjust for confounding variables. The results are presented as adjusted relative risks or adjusted mean differences.Results: Of the 1,112 adolescents who were monitored, 758 were included in this study. The overall incidence of adverse neonatal outcomes (low birth weight and prematurity) was measured as 10.2% (95% CI: 9.7–11.5). Apgar scores collected at 1 and 5 min were found to be normal, and no instance of fetal death occurred. The incidence of low birth weight was 16.1% for the 10–13 age group, 8.7% for the 14–15 age group and 12.1% for the 16–17 age group. The incidence of preterm was measured at 12, 8.5, and 12.6% for adolescents who were 10–13, 14–15, and 16–17 years of age, respectively. Neither low birth weight nor prematurity levels significantly differed among the groups (p > 0.05). The infants born to mothers aged 10–13 years presented significantly (p < 0.05) lower Apgar scores than other age groups, but the scores were within the normal range.Conclusions: Our findings showed lower incidence of neonatal adverse outcomes and no risk difference of neonatal outcomes in younger pregnancy adolescents. It potentially suggests that GPC model to care pregnant adolescents is more important than the age of pregnant adolescent, however further research is needed.

Highlights

  • Adolescent pregnancy is a public health concern due to the complexities and impacts of problems related to it [1]

  • One study reported an increase in maternal and fetal complications occurring during all stages of pregnancy among pregnant adolescents [8, 9]

  • The study was conducted at the Edward Maluf Municipal Polyclinic (EMMP), Sorocaba, using medical records for pregnant women who received prenatal care from 2009 to 2014

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Adolescent pregnancy is a public health concern due to the complexities and impacts of problems related to it [1]. Pregnancy is seldom planned or desired; in many cases, it results from abuse or sexual violence, causing permanent changes in their lives and creating a cycle of inequality, social exclusion, difficulty attending school, job loss, or reductions in work hours and the potential development of emotional disorders [2]. In Brazil, the rate of adolescent pregnancy is 400 thousand cases each year [5]. Adolescent pregnancy may be a risk factor for adverse obstetric, maternal, or neonatal outcomes such as prematurity, low birth weight, low Apgar scores, and neonatal and maternal mortality, mainly in mothers under 15 years of age [6, 7]. Adolescent pregnancy is a public health concern and many studies have evaluated neonatal outcomes, but few have compared younger adolescents with older using adequate prenatal care

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call