Abstract
Over the past century over 150 operations have been described for the treatment of urodynamic stress incontinence. The spectrum of operative approaches that are used reflect its variety of causes. Classical sling procedures provide bladder neck support, permitting urethral compression or kinking with increases in intra‐abdominal pressure and decreasing voiding dysfunction. There are well‐documented complications associated with sling procedures. Modifications of operative technique and sling materials, in particular the tension‐free vaginal tape, have lowered complication rates and operative morbidity. This article discusses potential benefits and risks associated with different surgical options, to aid selection of the most appropriate treatment for any individual.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
