Risks and benefits of local anesthesia versus general anesthesia in tonsillectomy

Abstract

PurposeTonsillectomy is one of the most common surgical procedures in otorhinolaryngology. Modern general anesthetic techniques have reduced surgical risks, but performing the procedure under local anesthesia may still offer significant benefit for both the patient and surgeon. This study analyzed the risks and benefits of performing tonsillectomies under local anesthesia. MethodsThis is a retrospective longitudinal cohort study analyzing postoperative bleeding rates as a primary outcome measure. Secondary outcome measures were duration of surgery, consumption of analgesics and total surgery cost. ResultsThe study enrolled 1112 patients undergoing tonsillectomy, with 462 (41.5%) patients treated under general and 650 (58.5%) patients treated under local anesthesia. There were 12 postoperative bleeding incidents in in the local anesthesia group and 9 cases of postoperative bleeding in the general anesthesia group. No significant differences based on gender regarding quantity of intraoperative bleeding or patient age were observed between the patients undergoing local versus general anesthesia. However, significant differences were noted between the groups in analgesic consumption, (Mann-Whitney U test, p = 0.001), duration of operating room stay (Mann-Whitney U test, p = 0.001), duration of surgery (Mann-Whitney U test, p = 0.001) and cost of surgery (Mann-Whitney U test, p = 0.001). ConclusionsThe incidence of postoperative bleeding is not dependent on type of anesthesia. The results suggest that tonsillectomy performed under local anesthesia is a safe alternative to tonsillectomy under general anesthesia, with significant reduction of cost and duration of surgery.