Abstract
In this paper, we provide a comprehensive study on the higher-order risk-neutral moments (RNMs) and differences in RNMs (DRNMs) in the crude oil market, implied by options written on the United States Oil Fund (USO). Based on the t-statistic, the in-sample and the out-of-sample R2 statistics, we compare the USO return predictability and USO option return predictability by using RNMs and DRNMs from May 2007 to April 2016. We find that (i) all RNMs have a poor out-of-sample performance of predicting USO returns and simple option returns, while the risk-neutral volatility (VOL) outperforms in terms of both in-sample and out-of-sample predicting delta-hedged option returns; (ii) most of the DRNMs can significantly predict the future USO returns, and (iii) differences in the risk-neutral third cumulant (DTC) and differences in the risk-neutral fourth cumulant (DFC) are two important predictors for the future USO option returns.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
