Abstract

The current emphasis on the need to protect radioactive sources from being used for malicious purposes makes it imperative to explore and shape an appropriate culture-based response. Promoting a robust security culture is consistent with the international legal instruments and standards including the Code of Conduct for the Safety and Security of Radioactive Sources and IAEA guidance publications. This promotion would be dependent upon the successful implementation of relevant self-assessment tools and a series of culture indicators, both of which would serve as benchmarks to take a culture’s measure and identify practical ways to improve security. This approach must adjust the generic IAEA model and self-assessment methodology for nuclear security culture in order to accommodate the specific requirements in operation when using radioactive sources. Though the IAEA’s concept of security culture and its self-assessment recommendations are designed to be generic in order to apply to a wide range of facilities and activities, the modifications proposed in this paper are needed to make those recommendations more user friendly and consistent with the security risks and requirements. The distinct features of the proposed recommendations, to be reflected in the new design of security culture, can be summarized as: continued prevalence of safety orientation, application in diverse work environments, multiple and inter-modal transport, integration of host organizations into overall security regime, mobile and portable operation, limited security awareness and resources, and disposal challenges. These special features also justify a differentiated approach to security culture inside organizations licensed to use radioactive sources. More frequent and more concerted efforts, including training and self-assessment, are expected to focus on a select group of employees who have direct relationships with radioactive sources (e.g. management teams, security personnel, operational staff, technicians and others). For other employees, efforts would be made concurrently to engage them in the process of raising security awareness, a less proactive endeavor than the development of security culture. The proposed differentiation is a targeted approach designed to make time and resource investment in training and culture assessment commensurate with specific roles and responsibilities of individuals. This risk-based approach can facilitate a more robust and sustainable security regime for radioactive sources throughout their life cycle, i.e. from cradle to grave.

Highlights

  • The IAEA defines nuclear security culture as “the assembly of characteristics, attitudes and behavior of individuals, organizations and institutions which serve as a means to support and enhance nuclear security.”[1]

  • This promotion would be dependent upon the successful implementation of relevant self-assessment tools and a series of culture indicators, both of which would serve as benchmarks to take a culture’s measure and identify practical ways to improve security. This approach must adjust the generic IAEA model and selfassessment methodology for nuclear security culture in order to accommodate the specific requirements in operation when using radioactive sources

  • As a supporting and enhancing tool, the role of culture may be understood in light of the definition of nuclear security, which is “the prevention and detection of, and response to, theft, sabotage, unauthorized access, illegal transfer or other malicious acts involving nuclear material, other radioactive substances or their associated facilities.”[2]. Since 2007, the IAEA has conducted numerous international, regional and national workshops to promote security culture and to train nuclear security personnel at all levels

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The IAEA defines nuclear security culture as “the assembly of characteristics, attitudes and behavior of individuals, organizations and institutions which serve as a means to support and enhance nuclear security.”[1]. From 2012, when the drafting of the Technical Guidance started, to 2018, self-assessments were conducted in Indonesia (research reactors), Bulgaria (nuclear power plant), and Malaysia (radioactive sources at two medical institutions). Both IAEA publications in the Nuclear Security Series were intended to serve as an introduction to the subject for their potential users. The model, its characteristics, and its indicators are generic enough to be used by regulatory bodies and other organizations involved in activities utilizing nuclear and other radioactive material, including transport. Given the lack of expertise and experience, for example, among some users of radioactive sources, the purpose of this paper is to demonstrate in a user friendly and efficient manner how to adjust the IAEA generic approach and meet the specific needs of their facilities for assessing security culture

Physical Protection and the Human Factor
The IAEA Concept of Nuclear Security Culture
Radioactive Sources
Integration into overall security regime of host organizations
Application in diverse environments
Mobile and portable operations
Limited resources and awareness
Disposal challenges
Differentiated Approach Toward Awareness and Culture
CONCLUSIONS
Works Cited
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call