Abstract

This paper presents an experimental investigation of risk taking in the domain of losses. The results are partly compatible with expected utility theory, assuming an inflection point in the utility function over losses. However, overweighting of low probabilities and underweighting of high ones was observed, which runs counter to the expected utility model. Additionally, a strong context effect was observed in which choices presented in an insurance context were judged with greater risk aversion than mathematically identical choices presented as standard gambles. Both the normative and descriptive implications for expected utility theory are discussed. This article examines two related issues regarding decision-making under conditions of objective or known risk. The first one concerns the nature of people's risk preferences for losses, and its compatibility with expected utility theory; the second concerns the extent to which such risk preferences are influenced by problem context.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.