Abstract
We introduce bilateral risk aversion into the mixed adverse selection - moral hazard model of Laffont and Tirole (1986). The presence of exogenous risk interacts with the adverse selection problem in interesting ways. In particular, we show that it is never optimal to present the firm with a fixed price contract, that the efficient firm typically bears more risk than the inefficient firm, and that an increase in exogenous risk may bring about a decrease in expected cost of the project. As a by-product, we also establish that the famous ‘no-distortion-on-the top’ result in adverse selection models relies on risk neutrality of the agent.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
