Risk of Revision and Complications After Total Hip Arthroplasty for Acute Treatment of Acetabular Fracture

Abstract

BackgroundTotal hip arthroplasty (THA) for the treatment of acute acetabular fractures may be indicated where there is high risk for failure of open reduction and internal fixation. This study aimed to determine risks of revision and rates of major complications of THA for acute acetabular fractures. MethodsA retrospective review was performed (all-claims data files of a large national database) by querying International Classification of Disease, 10th revision procedure codes for THA within 14 days of acetabular fracture. We identified all-cause revision and surgical complications including dislocations, mechanical failures (loosenings or broken prostheses), infections, as well as medical complications. Demographic data collected included age, sex, obesity, and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI). Multivariate analyses evaluated the association of revision and major surgical complications after adjusting for demographic characteristics and comorbidities. We identified 956 THAs for the treatment of acute acetabular fracture from 2015 to 2020. Of all acute acetabular fractures treated with THA, 241 were concomitant with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF), and 715 were THA-alone. ResultsAll-cause revision risk was 18.2%, overall major surgical complication rate 26.9%, and medical complication rate was 13.2%. Women were associated with increased risk of revision (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.8; confidence interval (CI) 1.3 to 2.6, P = .001), dislocation (aOR 2.0; CI 1.5 to 3.1, P < .001), mechanical complication (aOR 2.1; CI 1.4 to 3.2, P < .001), and infection (aOR 1.6; CI 1.0 to 2.5, P = .044). ConclusionWe noted risk of all-cause revision of 18.2%, overall major surgical complication rate of 26.9%, and overall major medical complication rate of 13.2% for THA as the treatment of acute acetabular fracture. We caution against broad expansion of THA for treatment of acute acetabular fractures. Furthermore, increased risks of revision and complications in women warrant additional investigation into patient and fracture characteristics that may contribute to this finding.