Abstract

There is a debate about the safety and effectiveness of surgical treatments for stress urinary incontinence. Controversy about the use of synthetic mesh sling insertion has led to an increased uptake of retropubic colposuspension and autologous sling procedures. Comparative evidence on the long-term outcomes from these procedures is needed. To compare the risk of reoperation at 10 years after operation between women treated for stress urinary incontinence with retropubic colposuspension, mesh sling insertion, and autologous sling procedures. The records of admissions to National Health Service hosptials were used to identify women who had first-time stress incontinence surgery between 2006 and 2013 in England. The first incidence of the following outcomes was assessed: further stress incontinence surgery, surgery for a complication (either mesh removal, prolapse repair, or incisional hernia repair), and any reoperation (either further stress incontinence surgery, mesh removal, prolapse repair, or incisional hernia repair). The cumulative incidence of each of these outcomes up to 10 years after surgery was calculated, considering death as a competing event. Multivariable modeling was then used to estimate the reoperation hazard ratios for the different initial surgery types with adjustments for patient characteristics and concurrent prolapse surgery or hysterectomy. The analysis included 2262 women treated with retropubic colposuspension, 92,524 treated with mesh sling insertion, and 1234 treated with autologous sling. The cumulative incidence of any first reoperation at 10 years was 21.3% (95% confidence interval, 19.5-23.0) after retropubic colposuspension, 10.9% (10.7-11.1) after mesh sling insertion, and 12.0% (10.2-13.9) after autologous sling procedures. The women who had a retropubic colposuspension were significantly more likely to have a reoperation than women who had an autologous sling (adjusted hazard ratio for any reoperation: 1.79 [1.47-2.17]; for further stress incontinence surgery: 1.64 [1.19-2.26]; for surgery for complications: 1.89 [1.49-2.40]), whereas the women who had mesh slings had a similar hazard (for any reoperation: 0.90 [0.76-1.07]; for further stress incontinence surgery: 0.75 [0.57-0.99]; for surgery for complications: 1.11 [0.89-1.36]). A sensitivity analysis excluding the women who had concurrent prolapse surgery or hysterectomy produced similar results. Retropubic colposuspension is associated with higher risk of reoperation at 10 years after surgery than mesh sling insertion or autologous sling procedures, with 1 in 5 women requiring reoperation.

Highlights

  • Since its introduction in 1998, synthetic mesh sling insertion has been the treatment of choice for stress urinary incontinence (SUI) in many countries

  • This study aimed to estimate the risk of reoperation associated with different types of SUI surgery, including retropubic colposuspension, mesh sling insertion, and autologous sling procedures, up to 10 years after surgery, using administrative hospital data on all the women who had first-time SUI surgery in the English National Health Service (NHS) between 2006 and 2013

  • The average time that women were followed-up to, defined as the time from SUI surgery to death or the end of follow-up, was 9.8 years for women treated with retropubic colposuspension, compared with 8.8 years for women treated with a mesh sling insertion, and 9.6 years for women treated with an autologous sling procedure

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Since its introduction in 1998, synthetic mesh sling insertion has been the treatment of choice for stress urinary incontinence (SUI) in many countries. Reports of severe adverse events following this treatment has led to a controversy about its use.[1] Some women treated with mesh slings have experienced pain, dyspareunia, persistent. Controversy about the use of synthetic mesh sling insertion has led to an increased uptake of retropubic colposuspension and autologous sling procedures. OBJECTIVE: To compare the risk of reoperation at 10 years after operation between women treated for stress urinary incontinence with retropubic colposuspension, mesh sling insertion, and autologous sling procedures. Multivariable modeling was used to estimate the reoperation hazard ratios for the different initial surgery types with adjustments for patient characteristics and concurrent prolapse surgery or hysterectomy

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.