Abstract
In the Danish faecal occult blood test based bowel cancer screening programme, the first round was rolled out over 4years. After roll-out, the planned faecal test recall procedure for individuals with either no or low risk adenomas at colonoscopy is 8 and 2years, respectively. Here, we aimed to investigate the post colonoscopy colorectal cancer incidence in these two groups. All Danish screening individuals from 2014 to 2015 with a positive faecal test and either no or low risk adenomas at colonoscopy were included and followed for 3years post screening for the event of colorectal cancer through national registries. Out of 533,023 submitted faecal tests and 36,673 positive tests, 17,627 had no or low risk adenomas. We identified 60 (0.34%) individuals diagnosed with colorectal cancer within 3years, 18 (0.29%) in the low risk adenoma group, and 42 (0.37%) in the no adenomas group (p=0.44). Advancing age (HR=1.079, p<0.001) and higher faecal test value (HR=1.001, p=0.002) increased hazard of colorectal cancer occurrence, whereas male sex (HR=1.3, p=0.308) and having low risk adenomas (HR=0.729, p=0.264) did not. We found no difference in post colonoscopy colorectal cancer occurrence between individuals with either no or low risk adenomas. Instead, advancing age and increased faecal test value was associated with a higher risk of post colonoscopy colorectal cancer.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.