Risk of obstructive sleep apnea in open-angle glaucoma versus controls using the STOP-Bang questionnaire

Abstract

ObjectiveTo compare the percentage of patients at risk for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in open-angle glaucoma (OAG) versus controls using the STOP-Bang questionnaire. MethodsThis study used a cross-sectional survey. Patients with OAG and controls completed the STOP-Bang questionnaire—a validated tool to identify patients at high risk for OSA. Patients were considered at risk if they scored 3 or more points or at high risk for moderate/severe OSA if they scored 5 or more out of the maximum 8 points. Demographic information, medical history, and previous diagnosis of OSA were recorded. Details regarding the patients’ glaucoma were obtained from their medical records. ResultsA total of 437 patients with OAG and 441 controls were included. The mean STOP-Bang score was 3.01 ± 1.3 for the glaucoma group and 3.03 ± 1.4 for the control group (p = 0.92). There was no significant difference between the percentage of subjects considered at risk for OSA (62.7% OAG vs 59.4% controls, p = 0.37) or at high risk for moderate/severe OSA (12.6% OAG vs 16.5% controls, p = 0.1). Significantly more patients in the control group had a previous diagnosis of OSA (p = 0.01). More patients with OAG reported feeling tired compared with controls (p = 0.003). A risk/high risk for OSA was not associated with glaucoma severity, progression, intraocular pressure control, or glaucoma type. ConclusionsOur results indicate that a risk or high risk for moderate/severe OSA as measured by the STOP-Bang questionnaire is not correlated with the presence or absence of glaucoma (regardless of the type), glaucoma severity, glaucoma progression, or IOP control.