Abstract

1522 Background: There is enough evidence supporting the benefits of screening mammograms than any other screening procedure for the early detection of malignancy. Compliance to the screening method is very important to achieve this purpose. There is some concern about future trends in breast cancer mortality as a decline in rates of mammogram screening has been noticed. Pain during mammography has been recognized as a significant deterrent to breast screening. Hence this study was done to evaluate compliance in screening mammogram and to analyze major reasons for noncompliance. Methods: Randomly selected patients visiting the doctor's office for various reasons were asked about mammogram and their experience. Their responses were tabulated and analyzed statistically. Results: Out of 160 people questioned, 155 patients had mammogram regularly at 1–2 year interval and five patients did not. 50% of respondents were 51–70 years of age, 15% were 50 years or under, and 31% were over 70 years. Ninety patients (58%) reported their mammogram experience was unpleasant, causing pain and bruising. In spite of the discomforts reported, 132 (82.5%) patients said they would continue the screening as recommended. However, 28 patients (17.5%) indicated their intention not to get further mammograms based on their painful experience, unless the screening technology was improved. Conclusions: Breast cancer incidence after peaking in 1998 has decreased 9.8% since then with a 12% decline in women aged 50–60. The sharpest decline was noted from 2003 that could be due to the decrease in the hormone replacement therapy after the Women's Health Initiative report. However, it may also reflect some reduction in screening mammograms from 70% (in 2000) to 66% (in 2005) as estimated by National Health Interview Survey. Various causes were attributed for the decline in screening mammogram rate including the discomfort and pain caused by compression during film mammography. More than 1 in 6 patients refusing to undergo further screening is definitely a sign of concern. Better screening methods like patient controlled compression mammogram reported by Duke University Medical Center or other methods are worth investigating, to improve the compliance of the one of the effective preventive measures. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.