Abstract
Estimates of the risk of dementia in Parkinson's disease (PDD) vary widely. We aimed to review the incidence of PDD and in a meta-analysis estimate the pooled annual incidence and relative risk of PDD while also exploring factors that may contribute to heterogeneity between studies. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were followed and MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched for articles reporting the number of cases of dementia in a population, followed longitudinally, with a minimum of 100 dementia-free Parkinson's disease (PD) patients at baseline. Meta-analyses and meta-regressions were used to estimate the pooled incidence rate of PDD and the relative risk of PDD versus healthy controls (HC). A total of 32 studies were identified, 25 reporting the incidence of PDD and 10 reporting the relative risk of PDD versus HC. The pooled incidence rate of PDD was 4.45 (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.91-4.99) per 100 person-years at risk, equating to a 4.5% annual risk of dementia in a PD prevalent population. The relative risk of PDD was estimated to be 3.25 (95% CI, 2.62-4.03) times greater than HC. Factors contributing to study heterogeneity and disparities in the estimated risk of PDD include the age of patients, year of recruitment, and study location. Significant gaps remain with no studies identified in several geographical regions. Future studies should stratify by age and standardize reporting to reduce overall heterogeneity. © 2024 The Author(s). Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.