Abstract
Classical compound Poisson risk models consider the premium rate to be constant. By adjusting the premium rate to the claims history, one can emulate a Bonus–Malus system within the ruin theory context. One way to implement such adjustment is by considering the Poisson parameter to be a continuous random variable and use credibility theory arguments to adjust the premium rate a posteriori. Depending on the defectiveness of this random variable, respectively referred to as ‘unforeseeable’ (defective) versus ‘historical’ (non-defective) risks, one obtains different relations between the ruin probability with constant versus adjusted premium rate. A combination of these two kinds of risks also leads to a relation between the two ruin probabilities, when the a posteriori estimator of the number of claims is carefully chosen. Examples for specific claim sizes are presented throughout the paper.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have