Abstract

Volcanic crisis management in small and densely populated islands is extremely complex. Preparedness 15 is critical to give an adequate response to volcanic unrest and reduce economic losses. However, such preparedness takes time, and involves a variety of groups of people and institutions, sometimes not only because of the requirements of knowledge with respect to self-protection but also because people must be made to change their understanding of the environment. Experience is vital if preparedness is to be improved meaning that the society at risk and the institutions involved in the management 20 sometimes have to face eruptive process. A key factor here is the magnitude and behavior of eruptive events, how these are understood by people and decision-makers, plus the ability to use them as real- life drills. Lower-medium magnitude eruptive events may help to better understand how these natural processes work but may give the impression that such events are easy to manage. Large eruptive events without preparedness can be catastrophic, and may be arduous to recover from as a result. The 25 idiosyncrasy of the society at risk plays a significant role here, thus improvements vary worldwide. In the present study, we address the initial situation in Tenerife (The Canary Islands) in 2004 and the local people's resulting response, while addressing other situations such as the pressure exerted by 1 international tour-operators or the tourist industry in general, the conflicting views of the scientists and how these affected the people, together with an overview of the management of the seismic catalog in 30 the Canary Islands as a key factor in volcanic crisis management. Current achievements will be compared to the situation given in 2004.

Highlights

  • Communication is one of the key factors in volcanic crisis management [Scanlon, 2011; Owolabi and Ekechi 2014]

  • Tourism is an important industry in some places where volcanic activity is significant

  • A second argued for a possible reactivation of the Teide-Pico Viejo Volcanic System Complex (TP-VSC) [García et al, 2006; Martí et al, 2009] while a third refuted any possible eruption and argued that the increased seismic activity was mainly related to an improvement in the monitoring network [Carracedo et al, 2006; Carracedo and Troll, 2006]

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Communication is one of the key factors in volcanic crisis management [Scanlon, 2011; Owolabi and Ekechi 2014]. Tourism is an important industry in some places where volcanic activity is significant In both the short and long-term volcanic areas, the tourist industry is affected when decisions are made to prohibit access to potentially dangerous areas when a new volcanic unrest is detected. Present achievements will be compared to the initial situation in 2004

A LIMITED VOLCANO MONITORING NETWORK
THE DETECTION OF THE VOLCANIC UNREST IN 2004 AND THE RESPONSE
THE CITIZENS’ RESPONSE
Growth in popularity
Dealing with Rumors
Level of trust
THE TOURISM ECONOMY AND THE RESULTANT PRESSURE ON VOLCANIC CRISIS MANAGEMENT
COMPARISON BETWEEN THEN AND NOW
NEW EMERGENCY PLANS
THE LEGAL FRAMEWORK AND MONITORING NETWORKS
THE SOCIETAL RESPONSE
SCIENTIFIC COMMUNICATION
A SPECIFIC CASE
EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS
DISCUSSIONS AND CONCLUSIONS
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.