Abstract

BackgroundSafety in laboratories is one of the most crucial topics for all educational institutes. All-hazards need to be identified, evaluated, and controlled whenever possible, following the risk management (RM) process. This study evaluates two academic laboratories’ risks and safety in the Department of Biomedical Science (BMS) at Qatar University (QU). The goal is to eliminate or reduce any risks to the students, teaching assistants, laboratory technicians, faculties, and other related workers, following an RM process.MethodsA cross-sectional study was performed from January to March 2020 in the BMS at QU. The study sample comprised of microbiology and hematology laboratories. Checklists and data collection sheets were used for data collection. Hazard evaluation failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) was used. The risk priority number (RPN) was calculated for all the identified hazards. For hazard control, the hierarchy of controls was followed.ResultsThe number of identified hazards was thirteen (n=13) in the hematology laboratory and sixteen (n=16) in the microbiology laboratory. Chemical and ergonomic hazards had the highest percentages in both laboratories, with 25% in the microbiology laboratory and 31% in the hematology laboratory. Both laboratories were free from radiation hazards. There is a significant difference between adopted and recommended control measures in each laboratory in terms of likelihood, severity, and risk priority number (RPN).ConclusionBoth chemical and ergonomic hazards account for almost a quarter of the hazards in both laboratories. The recommended control measure can decrease the severity and likelihood of identified hazards.

Highlights

  • Safety in laboratories is one of the most crucial topics for all educational institutes

  • We identified the potential hazards and deter­ mined the actions or control measures required to elimi­ nate or reduce any risks to the Biomedical Science (BMS) students, teaching assistants, laboratory technicians, faculties, and other related workers, following an risk management (RM) process

  • A prospective and retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted from January to March 2020 at the Biomedical Laboratory Science Department (BMS)College of Health Sciences (CHS) at Qatar University (QU)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Safety in laboratories is one of the most crucial topics for all educational institutes. All-hazards need to be identified, evaluated, and controlled whenever possible, following the risk management (RM) process. Chemical and ergonomic hazards had the highest percentages in both laboratories, with 25% in the microbiology laboratory and 31% in the hematology laboratory Both laboratories were free from radiation hazards. There is a significant difference between adopted and recommended control measures in each labora­ tory in terms of likelihood, severity, and risk priority number (RPN). The laboratory’s working environment could be exposed to several types of hazards simultaneously, which increases the risks.[1] Scientific institutions such as universities are responsible for ensuring the safety of the environment, campus, students, faculties, staff, and laboratory workers. Laboratory design, and the use of appropriate devices are essential to facilitate the laboratory work and decrease risks such as ergonomic and mechan­ ical hazards

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call