Risk for stroke and systemic embolism in patients with atrial fibrillation and heart failure according to heart failure type

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Risk for stroke and systemic embolism (SE) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure (HF) with mid-range (mr) ejection fraction (EF) is not well known. Methods Total 10,780 patients (age, 66.8±11.1 years; men, 64.7%) with AF were included in a prospective, multicenter AF registry. The patients were grouped into four according to HF type: no-HF, HF with preserved EF (HFpEF), HFmrEF, and HF with reduced EF (HFrEF). Baseline characteristics, cumulative incidence and hazard ratios for stroke/SE, major bleeding, and mortality were compared among the four groups. Results Proportion of patients with HF was 10.3%: HFpEF, 43.7%; HFmrEF, 23.6%; HFrEF, 32.7%. CHA2DS2-VASc score was significantly higher in the HFpEF, HFmrEF, and HFrEF groups than the no-HF group (4.0±1.7, 3.8±1.8, 3.5±1.8, and 2.5±1.6, respectively). Oral anticoagulants were administered in 83.6% of patients with CHA2DS2-VASc score ≥1. Annual incidence of stroke/SE was 2.0% in HFpEF group, 0.6% in HFmrEF group, 1.1% in HFrEF group, and 0.7% in no-HF group for 23.0±9.5 months of follow-up period. Cumulative incidence of stroke/SE was significantly higher in the HFpEF group than the no-HF and HFmrEF groups (p<0.001 and p=0.042, respectively; Figure). Risk for stroke/SE was significantly higher in the HFpEF group than the no-HF group [hazard ratio, 1.929; 95% confidence interval, 1.171–3.179, p=0.010]. There were no significant differences in risk for stroke/SE in the HFmrEF and HFrEF groups, compared with the no-HF group. There were no significant differences in major bleeding and mortality among the groups. Conclusions Risk for stroke/SE is highest in HFpEF and lowest in HFmrEF in patients with AF and HF. Figure 1 Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Public grant(s) – National budget only. Main funding source(s): National Research Foundation of Korea