Abstract

To assess risk factors of rejection after penetrating keratoplasty (PKP). This retrospective monocentric study assessed risk factors for rejection in patients who underwent PKP at Montpellier University Hospital between June 2005 and September 2018. Graft and donor data were obtained from our tissue bank in Montpellier. Clinical data of recipients were recorded from medical files. Survival was estimated by the Kaplan-Meir method. Potential risk factors of rejection were assessed by multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis, estimating hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Among the 316 consecutive patients (59% male, mean SD] age 52 [17]), 360 eyes underwent PKP. Indications for PKP were bullous keratopathy (27%), infectious keratitis (20%), and keratoconus (15%). The median follow-up was 44months (IQR 22-73). The overall graft survival and irreversible rejection rate at 5years were 70% and 29%, respectively. Factors associated with risk of rejection were prior indication for graft rejection (SHR [CI 95%] = 7.8 [2.6-23.1]), trauma (SHR [CI 95%] = 3.6 [1.1-11.7]), and infectious keratitis (SHR [CI 95%] = 2.7 [1.2-11.1]), history of corneal neovascularization (SHR [CI 95%] = 2.1 [1.2-3.8]), hypertonia (SHR [CI 95%] = 2.8 [1.8-4.3]), and mixed sex matching (SHR [CI 95%] = 2.0 [1.01-4.0]). The significant risk factors of graft rejection after PKP found in this study agree with those from major international cohorts: prior indication for graft rejection, history of neovascularization and high intraocular pressure. Sex matching donor-recipient is a most recent parameter in the literature confirmed by the present analysis. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04791696.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.